Acrylic Vs Polyester: Durability, Cost & Environmental Impact (2025)

This site is supported by our readers. We may earn a commission, at no cost to you, if you purchase through links.

You probably don’t give much thought to your fleece jacket or that cozy throw blanket on your couch, but these everyday items sit at the center of a fierce material debate. Both acrylic and polyester dominate the synthetic fiber market—together they account for over 60% of global fiber production—yet they perform radically differently depending on where you use them.

Polyester might outlast acrylic by years in outdoor gear, but acrylic’s wool-like softness makes it the go-to choice for winter wear. The catch? One releases 50% more microplastics into waterways than the other, and choosing between them means weighing durability against cost, warmth against water resistance, and immediate savings against long-term environmental consequences.

Polyester Basics

Polyester stands out as a workhorse synthetic fiber built from polyethylene terephthalate (PET), a petroleum-based polymer created through polycondensation reactions. Its chemical composition—roughly 62.5% carbon, 4.2% hydrogen, and 33.3% oxygen—gives it noteworthy fiber properties that translate directly into performance benefits you can feel. The material’s hydrophobic nature means it absorbs less than 1% moisture, actively wicking sweat away from your skin during intense activity.

That’s why polyester production has skyrocketed to 78 million tonnes globally in 2024, dominating 57% of all fiber output. When blended with natural fibers like cotton or wool, polyester boosts durability and abrasion resistance without sacrificing breathability. Manufacturers improve this synthetic fiber further with coatings that deliver both water repellency and UV resistance—a combination that makes polyester fabric indispensable in activewear, outdoor gear, and insulation applications where material behavior matters most.

The production of polyester relies heavily on chemical resistance properties, which contribute to its widespread use in various industries.

Acrylic Basics

Acrylic fibers contain at least 85% acrylonitrile monomer units, giving them a chemical composition that’s fundamentally different from polyester’s structure. This manufacturing process relies on radical polymerization followed by wet or dry spinning—techniques that create continuous strands with densities between 1.16 and 1.18 g/cm³, making acrylic considerably lighter than wool.

You’ll appreciate acrylic fabric for its superior warmth and softness, traits that stem from porous microstructures trapping air within the fibers. The material properties include moderate tensile strength (2–4 g/d) and impressive elongation recovery—99% at 2% stretch. However, moisture regain sits at just 1.0–2.5%, explaining why breathability remains acrylic’s weakest link.

Despite this limitation, textile applications favor acrylic for cold-weather accessories, upholstery, and technical uses where hypoallergenic qualities and UV resistance outweigh ventilation concerns. The production of acrylic fabric involves a complex polymer creation process that affects its overall quality and durability.

Polyester in Insulation

Shifting from acrylonitrile chemistry to another synthetic workhorse, you’ll discover polyester’s role in insulation hinges on recycled PET and structural innovation. Thermal performance reaches R-2.0 to R-4.1 per 100 mm, delivering heat retention through thermally bonded fibers that resist compression. This thermal behavior translates to consistent warmth across roofs, walls, and floors—critical for thermal comfort in demanding climates.

Environmental impact remains favorable compared to virgin materials, while weaving techniques and batt construction maintain stable R-values over decades without degradation.

Polyester Jackets: Softshells Vs. Hardshells

Beyond the sphere of insulation batt and recycled PET innovation, polyester dominates the performance jacket market through two distinct constructions. Softshell jackets rely on woven polyester blends with spandex, pairing fleece-backed inner layers with DWR-treated exteriors to deliver breathability levels exceeding 15,000 g/m²/24h—ideal for high-exertion pursuits where moisture-wicking matters most.

Hardshell jackets, by contrast, employ two- to three-layer laminated polyester with membranes like Gore-Tex, achieving waterproof ratings above 20,000 mm but sacrificing breathability to roughly 8,000–10,000 g/m²/24h. Weight comparison reveals hardshells compress 25–30% smaller, enhancing packability factors for alpine expeditions, while softshells trade bulk for comfort and flexibility.

Market trends confirm recycled polyester now constitutes up to 65% of fabric input, reflecting the environmental impact consciousness driving outdoor gear evolution.

Feature	Softshell Jackets	Hardshell Jackets
Waterproof Ratings	Light rain resistance (DWR coating)	20,000+ mm (membrane sealed)
Breathability Levels	15,000+ g/m²/24h	8,000–10,000 g/m²/24h
Weight Comparison	15 oz–1.6 lb (0.42–0.73 kg)	~1 lb (0.45 kg)
Packability Factors	Moderate compression	25–30% smaller pack volume
Primary Use	Active aerobic pursuits	Extreme weather protection

Acrylic in Insulation

When you’re hunting for warmth without weight, thermal conductivity becomes your compass. Acrylic registers just 0.19 W/(m·K)—far below single glass at 0.80—meaning you retain heat even in lightweight sweaters and blankets that rival wool’s insulation efficiency.

That’s why manufacturers embed acrylic fibers in building coatings rated to 150 °C, capturing 31.8% of the global insulation coatings market. Moisture resistance amplifies this advantage: acrylic’s low water absorption keeps thermal comfort intact during drizzle or perspiration, while fast-drying structures prevent the clammy chill polyester sometimes harbors.

Structural applications extend from automotive interiors to aerospace panels, where durability longevity matters—flame-retardant variants retain 40.7% mass under fire, and UV-stable coatings preserve performance across decades.

Energy efficiency follows naturally; insulated acrylic panels slash heating costs by blocking heat loss through windows and walls, delivering material comparison wins where light transmission and insulation must coexist.

Environmental Impact

When you choose synthetic fabrics, you’re making a decision that ripples far beyond your closet. Both acrylic and polyester carry significant environmental costs that begin at production and continue throughout their entire lifecycle.

Understanding these impacts helps you weigh the true price of durability and affordability against the planet’s wellbeing.

Microplastics

When you wash synthetic fabrics, you’re basically releasing invisible plastic particles into waterways—a phenomenon called Fiber Shedding. Acrylic releases approximately 1.5 times more microplastic particles than polyester during each wash cycle, contributing to Water Contamination.

Consider these impacts of Microplastic pollution:

• Acrylic fabrics shed about 730,000 microfibers per wash cycle
• Wastewater treatment plants allow up to 40% of microfibers to escape into rivers and oceans
• These microfibers cause Ecological Damage by entering the food chain through plankton and fish
• Persistent microplastics introduce toxic chemicals into ecosystems, raising concerns about Human Health

The Environmental impact of synthetic fibers extends beyond what you can see. Mitigation Strategies include using front-loading machines, washing at lower temperatures, and choosing natural alternatives when possible to reduce Textile waste from Microfibers.

Not Biodegradable

Once synthetic fibers like acrylic and polyester enter landfills, they persist for over 200 years due to their remarkable Polymer Stability. You won’t find easy Decomposition Rates here—laboratory studies show only 7% mass reduction under controlled biodegradation attempts.

This Landfill Persistence creates Textile waste that generates Methane Emissions as fibers slowly degrade anaerobically.

Despite representing 60% of global fiber production, Synthetic fibers face severe Recycling Challenges, with less than 5% converted into similar-grade materials, amplifying their Environmental impact and contributing to ongoing Microplastic pollution and Biodegradability concerns.

Greenhouse Gases

When you pick acrylic over polyester, you’re choosing a fiber with acrylic emissions nearly 134% higher—releasing roughly 46,660 kg CO₂e per tonne versus polyester’s 19,920 kg CO₂e. Energy demand tells a similar story: acrylic requires 175 MJ/kg, about 40% more than polyester’s 125 MJ/kg.

These greenhouse gases and microplastic pollution drive industry impact, contributing to the fashion sector’s 944 million metric tonnes annually.

Reduction pathways exist—recycled polyester cuts emissions by 25–30%, and renewable electricity could slash process emissions by 40%, addressing environmental concerns around environmental sustainability.

Dangers of Washing Acrylics

Every time you wash an acrylic sweater or blanket, you’re sending thousands of invisible plastic threads into waterways—up to 729,000 synthetic microfibers per laundry load. Acrylic fabric sheds nearly 1.5 times more microplastic pollution than polyester fabric, making it one of the worst offenders in microfiber pollution. These particles slip through wastewater treatment plants and infiltrate aquatic ecosystems, where marine life mistakes them for food. The result? Contaminated seafood that brings microplastics back to your plate—contributing to an estimated 78,000 to 211,000 particles of human ingestion annually.

Each wash of acrylic fabric releases up to 729,000 microfibers into waterways—contaminating seafood and delivering thousands of plastic particles back to your plate

Five Mitigation Strategies You Can Use Today:

1. Install washing machine filters that capture up to 89% of fiber emissions
2. Use specialized laundry bags like Guppyfriend to trap 54–80% of shed fibers
3. Wash acrylics in cold water and shorten cycles by 50% to reduce shedding by 30%
4. Choose natural fiber alternatives when possible to minimize environmental impact of fabrics
5. Follow proper fabric care and maintenance by washing synthetic garments less frequently

Material Costs and Chemical Resistance

When you’re choosing between acrylic and polyester, understanding the financial trade-offs reveals a fascinating paradox. Acrylic yarn generally costs 10–15% less per kilogram than polyester yarn, with acrylic acid pricing around US$1.01/kg in Northeast Asia compared to US$1.79/kg in North America—substantial regional variations that affect your bottom line.

However, polyester’s chemical compatibility tells a different story. It resists solvents like acetone and methyl ethyl ketone far better than acrylic, which cracks and fractures under the same exposure. This chemical resilience translates to 25–30% longer service life, making polyester’s cost-effectiveness excel over time.

While acrylic’s lower upfront cost tempts budget-conscious buyers, polyester’s chemical properties and durability reduce replacement frequency and repair expenses. Both markets are growing at roughly 5% annually, but polyester’s chemical composition—resistant to corrosion, UV degradation, and most dilute acids—justifies its premium pricing when you calculate lifecycle costs rather than just initial material expenses.

Durability and Fabrication

Polyester fabric delivers higher tensile strength and greater abrasion resistance compared to acrylic fabric, but these mechanical advantages come with fabrication trade-offs you must weigh. Polyester’s brittleness increases breakage risks during handling and creates more airborne dust when you’re sanding it—a real concern for your safety.

Acrylic fabric wins on ease of repair and fabrication methods. When you’re working with acrylic, chemical bonding for seams reduces human error versus polyester’s mechanical seaming approach. You’ll also generate less hazardous particulate during shaping, keeping your workspace safer. That’s why many fabricators prefer acrylic despite polyester’s advantage in durability.

Thermal stability affects your choices too. Acrylic’s pyrolysis temperature ranges from 190°C to 230°C, while polyester withstands higher heat during processing. However, pilling behavior tests consistently show acrylic generates more microplastics from fiber breakage—a durability concern over time.

Balance these synthetic fiber properties against your specific needs: polyester for strength-demanding applications, acrylic when fabrication ease matters most.

Creep and Dental Applications

When you’re selecting materials for dental prosthetics, creep—the gradual deformation under sustained load—becomes a make-or-break factor. Reinforced PMMA, the acrylic workhorse of denture bases, exhibits creep strain that increases from 1.4% to 2.4% as load doubles from 10 N to 20 N over four hours. That’s why adding TiO₂ nanoparticles cuts creep strain by 65%, dramatically improving denture base creep resistance.

Polyester fiber reinforcement offers another path: 4 mm fibers boost impact strength by 25% while reducing permanent deformation in bis-acrylic matrices. Composite creep strain ranges from 0.43% in dry conditions to 2.87% after ethanol exposure, showing how your mouth’s environment matters.

Silicone-based liners achieve 95% creep recovery versus acrylic’s 75%, directly affecting clinical implications like prosthesis fit over time. These material comparison insights help you minimize the 0.5% vertical deformation typical after one year of chewing.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)